Federal election: our votes count
By Maree O’Halloran
The Coalition and the ALP have started their federal election campaigns proper by sidelining issues of concern to public education supporters. Yet those supporters make up almost 70 per cent of the constituency.
The Howard Government is working overtime to convince the electorate that public schools and TAFE colleges are a state issue, and that the Federal Government’s role is to provide people
with the choice of a private school education. The
Latham Opposition, on the other hand, wants people to believe that “public
schooling” is not qualitatively different to “private
schooling”. Mark Latham pronounces that debate be dead. Funding is to be
based on “need” with unspecified additional funds to flow to
government schools and low-fee paying private
schools. Thus, while teacher unionists are seeing
cracks in the usual bipartisan policy about the funding of our schools, the
fundamental debate about the value of public education in a democratic and
pluralist society is deliberately avoided by the major parties. It’s
avoided because providing a quality, universal and free public education system
requires a far greater investment than governments of either ilk are prepared to
make. Public education is a federal and state
responsibility. Both federal and state governments
fund schools and TAFE. Both levels of government short change public education.
While the amount of direct Federal Government expenditure is smaller than the
State Government’s contribution, it still has a significant
effect. Thus, the Federal Government cannot be
allowed to merely shift blame to the states. During the federal election, it is
the Federal Government’s policies and decisions which should be examined
by voters. Where this Federal Government has a choice, it chooses to spend 73.7
per cent of its direct schools expenditure on the 32 per cent of students in
private schools. (2005–2008 direct Federal Government recurrent
expenditure on schools.) Federal governments have
not always made this choice. Until the early 1980s, the majority of direct
Federal Government funding went to public schools. In the Hawke/Keating years
this changed. The split was roughly 55 per cent private and 45 per cent public
until 1996 when the Howard Government was
elected. Since 1996 direct Federal Government
expenditure on private school students has increased at a far greater rate than
its expenditure on public school students. Public
education clearly cannot afford another Howard Government. Its policies are
about advancing privatisation at the expense of our great public
schools. The ALP has announced that there will be
additional funding for government schools but there has been no detail about its
funding policy. The result is an understandable and growing cynicism from public
education voters. On September 3, the Labor
Opposition announced a policy about “better schools, better teachers,
better values”. This policy followed the ALP’s “Community
Charter” with Catholic Schools on August 25.The effect of both releases
was to feed the perception created by Prime Minister John Howard of a problem in
our schools. If the ALP’s funding policy is
to be based on “need”, then the following analysis based on the 2001
Census data is instructive. Government schools
clearly have the highest proportion of children from low-income families. The
“need” of public schools is greater than the need of their
neighbouring private schools be they high or low fee
schools. The Greens' education policy remains
superior to that of all parties. Their importance in the next Senate cannot be
underestimated. Over the next few weeks teacher unionists have to ensure that
the value of and funding for public education becomes the issue of the
election.
Maree O’Halloran is the
President.
Weekly Family
Income
|
Low
|
Medium
|
High
|
|
<$800
|
$800–$1499
|
>$1500
|
All schools (Australia)
|
Government
|
42%
|
37%
|
21%
|
|
Catholic
|
27%
|
39%
|
34%
|
|
Other non-government
|
23%
|
30%
|
47%
|
Watershed federal election on October 9
Consider universities' future, says NTEU
TAFE: Questions that need answers
The impact of John Howard's policies on working women
Indigenous call for vote against Howard Government
For further information
September 2004 contents
|